The new age of workplace gossip – TMI!

workplaice_goss

Image taken from: http://fortifyservices.blogspot.com

I’ve discussed workplace gossip here before, and what bosses can do to prevent it or at least reduce the potential harm, but there are a couple of hyper-modern developments that I didn’t get into: reality television and the Internet. These two things have created a culture of “sharing”, for lack of a better word, that encourages people at play or work to divulge the most mundane and private details of their lives to others—the kind of information that one previously might only have shared with family or best friends.

The Internet—particularly social media—also encourages sharing private information about others that might best be kept to oneself, possibly because of the presumption of anonymity and privacy that comes with gossiping from behind a screen.

It should be clear that any gossip can be harmful to a workplace. See my previous posts for that argument. But excessive personal sharing—gossiping about oneself—is an interesting development. This can cause reactions mild or non-reactions in the receiver of the personal tidbits, but it can also cause shock, disgust and offence. In the Wall Street Journal, Elizabeth Bernstein lists many such examples of oversharing—what she calls the “Too Much Information phenomenon” at work. She also discusses briefly how to discourage oversharing:

“Whatever you do, do not reward the oversharing behaviour. Don’t listen. Don’t laugh, even out of nervousness. Change the subject. Try my late grandmother’s line: When she was stuck listening to something she deemed overly personal, she put a hand on the speaker’s shoulder and said, ‘I’m sorry, that is just too sad to talk about.'”

I wonder how many people do this these days without even realizing it: as if a story about passing out drunk at a nightclub were on the same level as getting a passport photo! Is there an oversharer at your workplace? Are you that person who doesn’t know where to draw the line? What’s your strategy to stop the information before it becomes too much?

Adam Gorley
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Assistant Editor

Share

Related Posts

Imagen 1

Employees with disabilities – accommodation strategies (Part I)

Accommodating employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship under human rights legislation can be a complicated task. It’s important to make sure the accommodation process goes smoothly and the employee can focus on working as efficiently as possible, but employers may not be sure about what kinds of questions to ask disabled employees in order to meet their needs.

Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD

Read more
Imagen 1

Slaw: Canadian Human Rights Commission’s controversial ‘anti-hate’ policy

The Canadian Human Rights Commission recently posted a policy on its website concerning how it interprets and applies section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA) when it receives an inquiry or complaint. The purpose of section 13 of the Act is to balance Canadians’ rights to equality and freedom of expression with respect to hate messages, as protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The parliamentary record indicates that section 13 was initially included in the legislation to address activities of individuals and groups who used the telephone system to disseminate hate messages. In December 2001, parliament amended the CHRA by adding section 13(2), which makes it clear that Internet hate messages come under the jurisdiction of the commission.

Read the whole article on Slaw.ca.

Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor

Read more
Imagen 1

Privacy risk management – by design

I’ve discussed the Privacy by Design principle before, in the Inside Internal Control newsletter. In case you don’t know, PbD is an approach developed by Dr. Ann Cavoukian, the Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, which proactively embeds privacy protection by default in the design of an organization’s practices and products.

Colin Braithwaite

Read more