Improving web accessibility – our own!

accessibility_banner_web

Image: www.cnib.ca

Customers demand more of businesses in so many ways these days—better quality and safety, greater social and environmental responsibility, extra service, and accessibility. The law increases its demands frequently, too. Even our governments and public service providers have a hard time keeping up with the legal requirements! Making improvements in all of these areas can challenge an organization, but only accessibility offers the advantage of access to a market of unrealized potential.

Many businesses will find themselves in new territory when it comes to making workplace changes to accommodate disabilities and age-related conditions. With the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act in place, and the accessibility standards on their way, we’ll all be finding our way together.

At First Reference Talks, we’ve recently received comments on difficulties accessing our web content, particularly leaving comments on our posts. We were using the common CAPTCHA system, which asks users to type a distorted series of numbers and letters before allowing them to comment—to prevent automated spam comments. But it turns out CAPTCHAs are incompatible with screen readers (devices persons with blindness and loss of vision use to access web content).

In addition, Glenda Watson Hyatt of Blog Accessibility writes:

CAPTCHAs do not keep out only people who are blind. With the distortion of characters or extraneous markings, people with learning disabilities, particularly dyslexia, can have difficulty deciphering what the actual characters are. Likewise, with poor colour contrast, those individuals with colour blindness or low vision can also have difficulty getting past the CAPTCHA step.

Even sighted readers with no disability were having trouble with the CAPTCHAs!

CAPTCHAs, suggests Watson Hyatt, are like “no blind people allowed” signs: “Sorry, your opinions, ideas, expertise—or purchases!—aren’t welcome here.”

Well, that’s not who we are, and it’s certainly not the way we want customers to see us. First Reference Talks has switched to a more accessible system that asks users to answer a simple multiple choice question, such as, “What shape does the Earth resemble?” Try it out; leave a comment on this post! (However, when choosing a more accessible encryption system for comments, you’ll probably have to combine it with a strong anti-spam plug-in.)

It’s not just that improving accessibility is the law, and it’s not just the opportunity for profit; it’s the right thing to do. And everyone benefits from more responsive, flexible and accommodating businesses. Disability is an issue that has remained out of sight despite its prevalence, and we are all realizing that the situation isn’t working any more.

First Reference is currently preparing to help organizations in Ontario meet their obligations under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act. I’ve been surprised by the issues and potential solutions several times, and I can only imagine the effort over the next few years as businesses modify their operations for accessibility.

Of course, our switch from inaccessible tool to more accessible tool is only a small step in response to an unexpected problem. We’ll make many more changes, small and large, reactive and proactive, in the future. Tell us what you’re doing to make your websites more accessible for people with all types of disabilities.

Adam Gorley
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Editor

accessibility
Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act
accommodating a disability
AODA
blind
blog comments
canadian employment law
CAPTCHA
Disability
dyslexia
employment law
internet accessibility
learning disability
screen reader
technology
vision loss
web accessibility
Share

Related Posts

Imagen 1

Addressing domestic violence in the workplace – some insights

The Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act violence and harassment prevention provisions (Bill 168) require an employer to take all reasonable precautions in the circumstances for the protection of all employees if a domestic violence situation is likely to expose a worker to physical injury in the workplace and the employer becomes aware or ought reasonably to be aware of the situation.

But what does that imply? The law states the requirement but provides little guidance on what employers need to do to prevent domestic violence from spilling into the workplace. In addition, many employers are not comfortable addressing a situation of such a personal nature. It is not an easy task to complete and might never be.

Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor

Read more
Imagen 1

Sleeping on the Job? What do you have to do to get fired in Canada, anyway?

Employees can be dismissed for cause, and therefore without notice or severance, when their misconduct or performance is so egregious that the employment relationship has been irreparably harmed. In assessing this issue, employers must adopt a contextual approach, which considers not only the misconduct in question, but the entirety of the employment relationship.

Rudner Law, Employment / HR Law & Mediation

Read more
Imagen 1

Employees with disabilities – accommodation strategies (Part I)

Accommodating employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship under human rights legislation can be a complicated task. It’s important to make sure the accommodation process goes smoothly and the employee can focus on working as efficiently as possible, but employers may not be sure about what kinds of questions to ask disabled employees in order to meet their needs.

Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD

Read more