SpringLaw
AI is becoming a game-changer in hiring and workplace decisions. It’s helping companies streamline recruitment, make smarter choices, and even tackle bias in the process. But two time-tested sayings apply:
Even the most advanced AI systems can make mistakes, misinterpret data, or perpetuate biases hidden in their training. Employers need to double-check AI-driven decisions to ensure they align with fairness, ethics, and the unique needs of their organization. By combining AI’s efficiency with human judgment, businesses can leverage its benefits without compromising on accountability or transparency.
AI is really shaking things up in recruitment and workforce management. Here are some popular ways it’s being used, along with considerations for maintaining personal engagement:
Balancing AI’s efficiency with thoughtful human involvement is key to avoiding potential pitfalls.
The type of role you’re hiring for often determines whether you lean on creative AI or technical AI.
This is best for roles where innovation and originality are key.
For example:
The challenge? Creativity is subjective, and AI might not always get it right—keywords don’t always equal talent.
For roles that require measurable skills and outcomes, technical AI might be the way to go.
Examples include:
While technical AI is great for objective roles, it can overlook candidates with unconventional paths who have tons of potential.
In Ontario, if you’re using AI in your hiring process, you have to be upfront about it. A new law—the Working for Workers Act, 2023—requires job postings to mention if AI tools are being used to screen or select candidates.
If you’re using AI in hiring, here’s what you need to keep in mind:
Here are some key points to consider:
Want to use AI responsibly? Start here:
AI has huge potential to improve hiring and workforce management, but it’s not a magic wand. By understanding the difference between creative and technical AI, being transparent, and staying compliant with laws, you can harness AI’s benefits while avoiding pitfalls.
If you’re considering AI tools or need help navigating the legal side of things, reach out. We’re here to help you get it right!
By Jeffrey Adams, SpringLaw
Employees can be dismissed for cause, and therefore without notice or severance, when their misconduct or performance is so egregious that the employment relationship has been irreparably harmed. In assessing this issue, employers must adopt a contextual approach, which considers not only the misconduct in question, but the entirety of the employment relationship.
Rudner Law, Employment / HR Law & Mediation
I’ve discussed workplace gossip here before, and what bosses can do to prevent it or at least reduce the potential harm, but there are a couple of hyper-modern developments that I didn’t get into: reality television and the Internet. These two things have created a culture of “sharing”, for lack of a better word, that encourages people at play or work to divulge the most mundane and private details of their lives to others—the kind of information that one previously might only have shared with family or best friends.
Adam Gorley
I’ve discussed the Privacy by Design principle before, in the Inside Internal Control newsletter. In case you don’t know, PbD is an approach developed by Dr. Ann Cavoukian, the Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, which proactively embeds privacy protection by default in the design of an organization’s practices and products.
Colin Braithwaite