Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD
A while back, I wrote about how mandatory training in ergonomics would be an effective way of preventing workplace injuries (musculoskeletal injuries/disorders and repetitive strain injuries), reducing absenteeism, increasing productivity and improving morale in the workplace. Have my opinions changed?
No. Back in 2010, I argued that, although several Canadian jurisdictions do not have specific legislation mandating the kind of ergonomic training I’m referring to, all jurisdictions have health and safety legislation requiring employers to protect employees’ health and safety and take preventive measures to protect employees from possible risk, hazards and injuries. Further, where a hazard cannot be eliminated or lessened to acceptable levels via engineering and administrative controls, employers must ensure that the appropriate personal protective equipment is used.
What’s more, some jurisdictions (British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Newfoundland and Labrador and federally regulated workplaces) do have specific provisions in their occupational health and safety legislation or regulations that require them to:
I said it then and I’ll say it again, every jurisdiction needs this kind of legislation.
It is clear, and the Ontario Ministry of Labour and WSIB will confirm, that musculoskeletal disorders are the leading cause of lost-time injuries in Ontario.
I’m talking about the kinds of injuries and disorders of the muscles, tendons and nerves that develop as a result of ongoing exposure to such things as repetitive work, forceful exertions such as heavy lifting and carrying, awkward postures and vibrating equipment that can affect the bones, joints, ligaments and other soft tissues.
What exactly is “ergonomics”? It is the scientific discipline concerned with interactions among humans and other elements of a system (e.g., the tools, equipment, products, tasks, organization, technology and environment). It is the science of designing the workplace and the job to fit the worker to ensure employees are not injured or made unusually uncomfortable when working.
Some may think this applies only to employees who have a very labour-intensive physical job. This is wrong. Sitting and typing all day at a computer is actually very hard on the body and can cause a lot of these injuries and disorders involving the muscles, tendons and nerves.
What can employers do, even if they do not have the kind of legislation I think should be present in every jurisdiction? If you want to avoid employee injuries, absences as well as employee pain and suffering, and you would rather increase productivity and morale in the workplace, it is recommended that you do the following:
Does your workplace provide ergonomics training to employees? If so, have you found an improvement to the point where there are lower frequencies of injuries?
Christina Catenacci
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Editor
The Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act violence and harassment prevention provisions (Bill 168) require an employer to take all reasonable precautions in the circumstances for the protection of all employees if a domestic violence situation is likely to expose a worker to physical injury in the workplace and the employer becomes aware or ought reasonably to be aware of the situation.
But what does that imply? The law states the requirement but provides little guidance on what employers need to do to prevent domestic violence from spilling into the workplace. In addition, many employers are not comfortable addressing a situation of such a personal nature. It is not an easy task to complete and might never be.
Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor
The Ontario Occupational Health and safety Act violence and harassment prevention provisions (Bill 168) require employers to provide information, including personal information, about a person with a history of violent behaviour if:
Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor
Ontario’s upcoming occupational health and safety violence and harassment rules require that employers implement violence and harassment prevention policies. Manitoba and Saskatchewan also require OHS policies for both workplace hazards. When drafting or updating your violence/harassment policies to meet legal OHS requirements (e.g., Ontario’s Bill 168), are you creating individual policies or integrating your policies? That was the question asked in the most recent HRinfodesk poll. According to the results of the poll, out of 155 responses, 84 (~54%) respondents intend to comply to the letter of the law, while 71 (~46%) respondents have taken another approach by integrating both policies into one.
Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor