Monitoring controls: The top ten tax controls

Occasional Contributors

Time to read 4 minutes read
Calendar July 15, 2013

At year end, external auditors heading into the tax department do not generally rely on internal controls to reduce testing; a great deal of effort is focused on substantively testing the income tax balances on the financial statements. Tax processes are notoriously manual in nature with numerous adjustments required to manipulate general ledger information into useable tax information. We have compiled a list of the top ten tax controls every company should have in place with the emphasis (as expected) on monitoring controls. By proving these internal controls are reliable, a company should be able to argue that less testing is required by its external auditors thereby reducing audit fees.

  1. Ensure source information gathered from the accounting and other external departments is accurate. Does your tax process ensure that raw data is referenced back to the trial balance to ensure there are no material differences?
  2. Ensure tax rates used for current and future tax calculations are correct. Does your tax process ensure that rates used in calculations have been checked to an external source such as a current version of Income Tax Act or taxing authority website (domestic and foreign)?
  3. Ensure the accuracy of the tax calculations. How does you tax department keep abreast of any changes in domestic and foreign tax legislation? Does your tax process ensure that calculations are correct by re-calculating material numbers? Does your department restrict access to spreadsheets used for calculations? Are changes made to spreadsheets tracked and reviewed separately to ensure errors do not occur?
  4. Ensure that tax contingencies are adequately supported. Does your tax process ensure that every contingency item is supported with a dollar amount, a related taxation year and the rationale for the contingency? Does your company have to comply with FIN 48 requirements?
  5. Ensure the book to actual (“BTA”) adjustment has been made. Does your tax process ensure that two separate adjustments are recorded (i) prior year’s tax provision estimate to tax return filed adjustment and (ii) prior year’s tax return filed to the assessed amount? Furthermore have you considered why there are significant differences (if any) and can the provision process be improved to reduce these adjustments.
  6. Ensure inputs for future tax balances are accurate and reasonable. The decision of whether and where (short or long term) to record a future tax asset/liability may be partially based on the company’s revenue forecast in specific jurisdictions, financing plans, planned acquisitions and divestitures, etc. Does your tax process ensure that tax is involved in these strategic discussions and has the most current information?
  7. Ensure that tax entries are properly authorized and posted correctly to general ledger and tax accounts. This has two parts as payments into and adjustments between tax accounts (taxing authority accounts) should be properly authorized and reconciled on a monthly basis to ensure balances correct for each legal entity and taxation year. The second part is to ensure that the journal entries made to record the payments, adjustments, accruals, and expense, etc are properly authorized and the general ledger accounts reconcile to tax working papers.
  8. Ensure that the income tax balances are recorded according to generally accepted accounting principles. Does your tax process ensure there is adequate documentation to support that taxes are recorded correctly? How does the tax department keep abreast of changes to accounting for its domestic and foreign companies? Have accounting tax policies been approved by the chief financial officer and agreed to by external auditors?
  9. Ensure that all tax-related figures used for public dissemination have been agreed. Does your tax process ensure the tax department reviews and agrees all other tax-related figures in the MD&A, annual report and annual information return?
  10. Ensure that a Tax Plan Implementation Review is performed. Does your tax process ensure that tax plans implemented have been appropriately authorized, implemented and measured?

About the author
Ana Sainz
Claret Partners Limited
The Claret Partners Limited is a consulting firm dedicated to providing the best in regulatory compliance, tax, risk and governance services as consultants and project managers creating workable and practical solutions. A TPIR is an important part of the strong internal controls for any entity; we can assist you in the following ways.

  • Complete the TPIR.
  • Gather adequate documentation on the tax plan.
  • Research of tax law for impact of any changes on the plan and quantify where possible.
  • Assess success of tax plan based on predetermined parameters.
  • Drafting mandates, policies and procedures for tax related processes.
  • Design and implementation, and testing of internal controls over income tax balances.
  • Improve performance of the tax processes by reducing time required to complete and/or enhance information obtained by applying our proprietary operational risk methodology (The Claret Process™©).

For more information please contact Ana Sainz at ana@theclaretpartners.com.

Table of Contents

Compliance Made Easy®

Canada’s most trusted compliance software for quick and easy HR, payroll, and internal controls compliance and policy management.
Book a Demo

Related Posts

Imagen 1

Privacy risk management – by design

I’ve discussed the Privacy by Design principle before, in the Inside Internal Control newsletter. In case you don’t know, PbD is an approach developed by Dr. Ann Cavoukian, the Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, which proactively embeds privacy protection by default in the design of an organization’s practices and products.

Colin Braithwaite

Read more
Imagen 1

Hiring controls: a close look at managing the risks of hiring

Human capital is a firm’s most important and profitable asset. Recall Swiss banking giant UBS’ rogue trading disaster in 2011, during which the bank reported a $2.3-billion loss as a result of one man’s unauthorized trading. UBS’ chief executive officer resigned as a result, and the bank also lost two high-ranking executives who took indirect responsibility for the incident…

Occasional Contributors

Read more
Imagen 1

Understanding enterprise architecture and related risks

Enterprise architecture is an important topic to organizations from executives, to IT/business resources, to customers, at all levels and around the globe. This blog post features input from three EA experts, from Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom.

Ron Richard

Read more