Responding to a human rights complaint

As an employer it is always possible that your organization will become involved in a human rights complaint— most likely as the respondent. Being the respondent means that a complaint has been filed against you, probably by an employee, former employee, customer or other member of the general public. You must respond in writing to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) within 35 days in order to preserve your legal rights.

Responding to an accusation that you have violated someone’s human rights can be overwhelming for a small/medium size business. The accusation may appear to have developed out of thin air and you may not be sure where to turn first. This online response form provided by the HRTO is designed to simplify the process of responding to a human rights complaint application.

The form is a real great tool because it walks you through the entire response process. The form contains a link to the respondent’s guide, another great tool that provides additional guidance. When completed online you may email the form directly to the HRTO. It is not necessary to send a copy to the Applicant (the person who filed the complaint about you or your company).

Common questions answered directly on the form include:

  • What happens if I don’t file a response?
  • What if I feel I have a valid defense to the allegations?
  • Does an exemption under the Human Rights Code apply to this case?

You can ask the HRTO to dismiss an application for the reasons listed below and the form spells out all this information; all you need to do is check off the correct box. When the following conditions exist you do not need to complete the entire response form, just this section!

  • The applicant has already settled the matter with you and signed a waiver agreeing not to file a human rights complaint
  • The case is before a civil court on substantially the same issues (an applicant is not allowed to “double-dip”)
  • The HRTO has already heard this case on substantially the same issues
  • The case is within federal jurisdiction and the HRTO is unable to hear it

You will need to submit documentation to support your claim when indicating in your response that one or more of the above conditions applies. The documentation necessary is described fully on the form and in the respondent’s guide.

Where another proceeding has appropriately dealt with the case you can also ask the HRTO to dismiss it. In this situation however, you will need to complete the response form in its entirety including why you think the case has been already dealt with. This situation often occurs when an employee or former employee starts concurrent legal action perhaps with the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) or files a union grievance that proceeds to arbitration.

Another option is to ask the HRTO to postpone, or defer, the application because the matter is currently being heard by an arbitrator or other decision making body. The form indicates clearly the information you are required to provide when this is the case.

I highly recommend that you take a few minutes and review this form. Interesting and informative sections point you to documents you need to have in order to respond to a human rights complaint including:

  • Job descriptions outlining essential duties of a job
  • Workplace policies include Human rights related policies
  • A process for filing an internal human rights complaint
  • Other documentation that supports your response

Responding to a human rights complaint is never simple. This form simplifies the process for you but does not take the place of legal advice. Remember the mantra—Learn don’t litigate—be proactive instead of reactive.

Andrew Lawson
www.learndl.ca

discrimination
employment law
Human rights complaint
human rights complaint application
Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario
legal advice
legal rights
respondent
Share

Related Posts

Imagen 1

Addressing domestic violence in the workplace – some insights

The Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act violence and harassment prevention provisions (Bill 168) require an employer to take all reasonable precautions in the circumstances for the protection of all employees if a domestic violence situation is likely to expose a worker to physical injury in the workplace and the employer becomes aware or ought reasonably to be aware of the situation.

But what does that imply? The law states the requirement but provides little guidance on what employers need to do to prevent domestic violence from spilling into the workplace. In addition, many employers are not comfortable addressing a situation of such a personal nature. It is not an easy task to complete and might never be.

Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor

Read more
Imagen 1

Sleeping on the Job? What do you have to do to get fired in Canada, anyway?

Employees can be dismissed for cause, and therefore without notice or severance, when their misconduct or performance is so egregious that the employment relationship has been irreparably harmed. In assessing this issue, employers must adopt a contextual approach, which considers not only the misconduct in question, but the entirety of the employment relationship.

Rudner Law, Employment / HR Law & Mediation

Read more
Imagen 1

Employees with disabilities – accommodation strategies (Part I)

Accommodating employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship under human rights legislation can be a complicated task. It’s important to make sure the accommodation process goes smoothly and the employee can focus on working as efficiently as possible, but employers may not be sure about what kinds of questions to ask disabled employees in order to meet their needs.

Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD

Read more