Belle Yuan, HR consultant, Strategywise HR
So, the results are in, the investigation is now complete – but as an employer or HR leader, your work is not yet done. In fact, the real work in restoring the workplace is just beginning. This is the final installment of our 3 part blog series on the steps and what to consider in the life cycle of a harassment complaint:
Part 2 – Conducting the investigation
Part 3 – Post-investigation
No matter how well a workplace investigation is planned and carried out, the process itself will often leave the work environment tense and awkward in the aftermath. Whether the complaint is substantiated or not, there will usually be lingering emotions or hurt feelings at the end of it which requires intervention.
This is a crucial phase for you to follow through on the findings of an investigation in order to demonstrate the company’s commitment to protect the health and safety of your employees. Tangible actions here will move the parties forward and restore the workplace so that work can continue.
From my experience, an employer’s silence and inaction to close the loop once a complaint is filed is a sure way to increase legal risk as there will inevitably be impacts to trust, morale and productivity in the workplace.
The focus of this article will be to examine some tips and actions you as a business or HR leader can take to help reduce your liabilities and restore a harmonious and safe work environment post-investigation.
Plan and decide internally what actions will be taken as a result of the investigation findings. It could be remedial coaching, training, transfers, program development, apology, discipline, termination and so on. Disciplinary action may be necessary in the event there is merit to the complaint and in that case, the respondent’s employment file will need to be reviewed to determine the appropriate action. In other cases, the behaviour may not have amounted to the level of workplace harassment, bullying or discrimination, but a problem of workplace incivility or conflict still exists that need to be resolved. Therefore, whether the complaint is substantiated or not, some action may still be necessary.
Provincially-regulated employers are legally obligated to investigate upon learning of a workplace violence or harassment complaint without considering other ways to resolve first. Given this, you can assess options for dispute resolution (i.e. mediation if appropriate) once the findings are known. Determine whether there is an opportunity to bring the parties together to clear the air and work towards repairing the damage in order to get back to work. Both sides must consent for this to work.
Scenarios this can typically apply to involve investigation findings where the complaint was not substantiated and there appears to be an honest misunderstanding. Alternatively, it can also be in cases where the complaint was substantiated and the respondent recognizes wrongdoing. In this case, a personal and sincere apology can go a long way in helping the parties restore and continue the working relationship.
Meet with the parties of the complaint to promptly communicate the results of the investigation and any actions that will be taken to minimize re-occurrence should the complaint be substantiated. Schedule time (in person where possible) to review the investigation results separately with the complainant and the respondent. As a general guideline, some suggested points of discussion include:
For the complainant:
For the respondent:
This can involve targeted communications with the union (if applicable) and Health and Safety committee about the conclusion of the investigation. Or it can also involve a general employee communication to help calm the rumour mills and rebuild some trust and sense of safety for employees if the investigation involved many witnesses and the situation was widely known in the workplace. In this case, it would be prudent to hold a larger team meeting to cycle back and communicate the following:
At times, the complaint is only the tip of the iceberg. Workplace climate issues may be systemic. When there are other signs and symptoms in the workplace such as increased absences, sick leaves, turnover, hyperactive rumour mills, low morale and productivity to name a few, this may signal that more needs to be done to get at the root of the problem and restore the workplace. Particularly, if there is suspicion that harassment/ bullying/ discrimination issues are more widespread affecting overall workplace culture and creating a toxic work environment, a workplace assessment would be recommended.
The purpose of this process is to uncover underlying issues impacting the workplace climate or culture. Employees are more likely to open up to a neutral third party in these situations and the goal would be to develop targeted action plans from the findings of the assessment. It is only when you understand the root causes of issues can you then be in a better position to address them and work on improving and restoring the workplace from there.
Any inconsistent applications of the company’s anti-harassment/anti-discrimination/anti-violence policies may expose the employer to increased liabilities. Some policies may be good in theory but when applied, gaps in procedure and differences in interpretation may be identified. Therefore, once an investigation is completed, this is the time to review and make any adjustments to procedures and expectations set out in the policies. Do it while your memory is still fresh. In doing so, all will have a better understanding of what to expect and will serve to promote consistent application of the policy going forward.
The above steps and strategies I’ve outlined in this article provide some guidance for employers and HR on what to do next after an investigation is complete. This is a vital stage in the life-cycle of a harassment complaint as parties involved in an investigation will often still need to work together after all is said and done. Taking steps to restore relationships and the workplace is necessary to diffuse interpersonal tension and conflict so that a psychologically safe and healthy work environment can be restored.
The Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act violence and harassment prevention provisions (Bill 168) require an employer to take all reasonable precautions in the circumstances for the protection of all employees if a domestic violence situation is likely to expose a worker to physical injury in the workplace and the employer becomes aware or ought reasonably to be aware of the situation.
But what does that imply? The law states the requirement but provides little guidance on what employers need to do to prevent domestic violence from spilling into the workplace. In addition, many employers are not comfortable addressing a situation of such a personal nature. It is not an easy task to complete and might never be.
Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor
The Ontario Occupational Health and safety Act violence and harassment prevention provisions (Bill 168) require employers to provide information, including personal information, about a person with a history of violent behaviour if:
Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor
Employees can be dismissed for cause, and therefore without notice or severance, when their misconduct or performance is so egregious that the employment relationship has been irreparably harmed. In assessing this issue, employers must adopt a contextual approach, which considers not only the misconduct in question, but the entirety of the employment relationship.
Rudner Law, Employment / HR Law & Mediation