SpringLaw
In a competitive job market, many employers turn to implementing bonus programs or offering other fringe benefits like car allowances to attract and retain talented employees. However, employers are often surprised to learn that they may owe recently terminated employees ongoing bonus payments and other fringe benefit payments through the employee’s notice period. In this blog, we will explore why these entitlements may be awarded, the length of time the employer may be on the hook for paying these sorts of entitlements, and what an employer can do to avoid such an unwelcome surprise.
First, a word on post-termination entitlements more generally. Employees in most Canadian provinces are presumptively entitled to something called reasonable notice. This is a period of time awarded to a recently dismissed employee meant to cushion them from one role to the next. The period awarded is based on several factors including but not limited to the age of the employee at the time of termination, length of service, the character of the employment, and the availability of other similar employment opportunities.
While minimum standards legislation usually calls for between one to eight weeks of notice for termination (or more if your employee is receiving both termination notice and severance pay), reasonable notice periods are generally much longer and can range between several weeks and several months. In fact, in some cases, like those involving older employees with lengthy periods of service, the notice period can even be in the realm of 20-26 months. The only way to oust the employee’s right to the reasonable notice period is through an enforceable employment contract which limits the employee’s entitlements upon termination to something less than what is offered through the common law reasonable notice period but also upholds the standards set by minimum standards legislation.
While more and more employers seem to be becoming familiar with the concept of reasonable notice, it still seems to come as a surprise just what the employee might be owed during this period.
Generally speaking, Ontario courts typically expect the employee to be compensated as if they continued to work throughout the period of notice. This means that if before termination, your employee was regularly receiving bonuses and fringe benefits like a car allowance, you can assume a court would expect that the employee receive this during the notice period too. However, just as employers can limit entitlement to reasonable notice periods, employers can and should be turning their attention to limiting the sorts of compensation employees may be entitled to after termination.
In order to limit any nasty post-termination entitlement surprises, employers should consider the following:
Employees can be dismissed for cause, and therefore without notice or severance, when their misconduct or performance is so egregious that the employment relationship has been irreparably harmed. In assessing this issue, employers must adopt a contextual approach, which considers not only the misconduct in question, but the entirety of the employment relationship.
Rudner Law, Employment / HR Law & Mediation
I’ve discussed the Privacy by Design principle before, in the Inside Internal Control newsletter. In case you don’t know, PbD is an approach developed by Dr. Ann Cavoukian, the Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, which proactively embeds privacy protection by default in the design of an organization’s practices and products.
Colin Braithwaite
This year’s Ontario Employment Law Conference co-sponsored by First Reference and Stringer Brisbin Humphrey on June 2, 2010, will touch on several topics of importance to employers. The first topic on the Agenda will provide employers with guidance on a significant court decision and changes in court procedures affecting the termination process. Specifically it should help employers minimize claims arising from the termination process.
Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor