Rudner Law, Employment / HR Law & Mediation
Consider this: you provide a new agreement to an existing employee. The agreement contains a termination clause limiting the employee’s entitlements upon termination to the minimum under the statute. The employee signs the contract. Several years later, after dismissing the employee and providing them with their minimum statutory entitlements, you receive a letter from the employee’s lawyer seeking 24 months of pay in lieu of notice. The employee alleges that the contract is unenforceable due to a lack of consideration. You seek legal advice from an Employment Lawyer and are shocked to be told that the new contract was not implemented properly, and thus cannot be relied upon. As a result, you are likely to be on the hook for close to two years of pay, instead of the eight weeks you expected.
Put simply, it is something of value offered in exchange for signing the agreement. Without consideration, an agreement will not be binding.
For new employees, the consideration offered at the outset of the employment relationship is typically the offer of employment itself. However, once an offer has been made and accepted, the employer must provide fresh consideration in order to change the terms of the relationship. Accordingly, if an existing employee is asked to sign a new employment agreement, they must be provided with fresh consideration (e.g. a signing bonus, a raise, more vacation days, or some other greater benefit) in exchange for signing the new contract. Otherwise, the agreement will not be enforceable.
One of the most common mistakes employers make is to provide a verbal offer of employment, including the employee’s position, compensation, the starting date and discussion of other terms. If the employee accepts the offer, the parties have a verbal agreement, which means that even though there is no written agreement in place, the parties still have a binding contract. The binding contract includes the terms and conditions verbally agreed upon between the parties, as well as various employee-friendly terms that are implied by law (including the employment standards legislation and the common law, such as the duty to provide reasonable notice or pay in lieu of notice upon termination without cause).
After the verbal agreement is already in place, and after the employee has already started working, many employers then have the new employee sign a written contract outlining various terms and conditions that benefit the employer. Since there is already a binding agreement in place at that time, both parties must receive some sort of consideration in order to have an enforceable new agreement.
It is critical that employers provide employees with effective written agreements before they commence employment, and ensure that the agreement is signed before the employee actually starts working.
For existing employees, employers must provide fresh consideration in exchange for signing the new contract in order to ensure that the contract can actually be relied upon. We often recommend employers to put new agreements in place when they offer a promotion or a pay raise. If the employer is not planning to offer a promotion or a raise, then they can offer a one-time signing bonus, more vacation days, or anything else that has a real value to the employee.
The issue is not whether the employee has signed the contract, but whether a court will find the contract enforceable in the future. Otherwise, the contract will not be worth the paper it is printed on.
Employers would be wise to ensure they have enforceable written agreements in place that maximize their rights and flexibility, and minimize their costs and liability. Here are some best practices for employers:
By Nadia Zaman
Employees can be dismissed for cause, and therefore without notice or severance, when their misconduct or performance is so egregious that the employment relationship has been irreparably harmed. In assessing this issue, employers must adopt a contextual approach, which considers not only the misconduct in question, but the entirety of the employment relationship.
Rudner Law, Employment / HR Law & Mediation
I’ve discussed the Privacy by Design principle before, in the Inside Internal Control newsletter. In case you don’t know, PbD is an approach developed by Dr. Ann Cavoukian, the Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, which proactively embeds privacy protection by default in the design of an organization’s practices and products.
Colin Braithwaite
This year’s Ontario Employment Law Conference co-sponsored by First Reference and Stringer Brisbin Humphrey on June 2, 2010, will touch on several topics of importance to employers. The first topic on the Agenda will provide employers with guidance on a significant court decision and changes in court procedures affecting the termination process. Specifically it should help employers minimize claims arising from the termination process.
Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor