Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD
The gap between men and women is still very significant when it comes to employees in the top ranks of the financial sector. That is, there are still very few women in senior executive roles at Canada’s financial institutions. Worse yet, there are currently no women in line for a chief executive officer position at a big bank.
Am I surprised? Not really. I have discussed this issue a few times: here, here and here.
So when I examine what has been going on in most industries these days, particularly the traditionally male-dominated industries, it does not surprise me one bit. It also does not surprise me when I see people in 2010 predicting that we may see women in these top executive roles in the next 20 years. But it is disheartening, as I did the same kind of predicting in 1990; I expected to see women in these roles in 20 years and it hasn’t happened, despite the numbers of women who became educated and qualified for these positions.
What worries me is that the current culture will remain in place because it has taken place for years and continues to be promoted within the male-dominated office culture. Women who have been shut out by the culture are no longer there to create change; they already left the environment for greener pastures. Unless we try to address the problem now, we will continue to make these kinds of empty predictions in 20 years.
Some say that women want a work-life balance so that means they cannot aspire to be in executive roles. But does it explain why women who are already in less senior executive positions are being overlooked when the banks look for and start recruiting CEOs?
Interestingly, it appears to be more common for women in the credit union sector to advance into more senior roles. Could it have something to do with the appointment process? Could differing methods of selection compared to the traditional appointment method by boards of directors generate different results?
What do you think?
Christina Catenacci
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Editor
Accommodating employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship under human rights legislation can be a complicated task. It’s important to make sure the accommodation process goes smoothly and the employee can focus on working as efficiently as possible, but employers may not be sure about what kinds of questions to ask disabled employees in order to meet their needs.
Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD
The Canadian Human Rights Commission recently posted a policy on its website concerning how it interprets and applies section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA) when it receives an inquiry or complaint. The purpose of section 13 of the Act is to balance Canadians’ rights to equality and freedom of expression with respect to hate messages, as protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The parliamentary record indicates that section 13 was initially included in the legislation to address activities of individuals and groups who used the telephone system to disseminate hate messages. In December 2001, parliament amended the CHRA by adding section 13(2), which makes it clear that Internet hate messages come under the jurisdiction of the commission.
Read the whole article on Slaw.ca.
Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor
I’ve discussed workplace gossip here before, and what bosses can do to prevent it or at least reduce the potential harm, but there are a couple of hyper-modern developments that I didn’t get into: reality television and the Internet. These two things have created a culture of “sharing”, for lack of a better word, that encourages people at play or work to divulge the most mundane and private details of their lives to others—the kind of information that one previously might only have shared with family or best friends.
Adam Gorley